Participation
- People reached
- Children/adolescents participating
- Participation by population group
- Attendance rate
- Completion rate
- Satisfaction
Impact & Sustainability
Evidence to learn, decide and remain accountable
This page presents the Katari Impact & Evidence Framework as an initial institutional proposal for structuring results, indicators, evidence, evaluation and sustainability. It does not publish historical results or unverified figures.
01 · How we understand impact
How we understand impact
The framework distinguishes resources used, activities delivered, immediate products or results, observable changes and contribution to impact. The number of activities may inform implementation monitoring, but it does not demonstrate impact on its own.
Activity ≠ output ≠ outcome ≠ impact
The framework keeps these layers distinct so that activity volume is not converted into an impact claim.
- Activity
Definition: an action delivered as part of a validated intervention.
Illustrative example: delivering a planned learning activity.
- Output
Definition: an immediate product or result directly attributable to implementation.
Illustrative example: a session completed or a product delivered as designed.
- Outcome
Definition: a verifiable change in conditions, capabilities, access or behaviour.
Illustrative example: a measurable change in knowledge or capabilities.
- Impact
Definition: a sustainable contribution to wider change supported by appropriate evidence.
Illustrative example: a sustained contribution to a broader improvement.
02 · Theory of Change
A verifiable chain of change
- 01Needs and vulnerabilities
- 02Resources and partnerships
- 03Interventions
- 04Immediate results
- 05Verifiable changes
- 06Sustainable impact
03 · Results Framework
From theory to project-level monitoring
The future model for each intervention should connect objectives, activities, outputs, outcomes, indicators, evidence and responsible roles. The public architecture does not assign targets or results without a verifiable project record.
Indicator specification
Each KPI should be able to record the following fields:
- baseline
- Starting point.
- target
- Target defined for the intervention.
- actual
- Observed value when evidence exists.
- unit
- Unit of measurement.
- source
- Source supporting the data point.
- frequency
- Recording or review frequency.
- responsible
- Responsible role.
- disaggregation
- Applicable disaggregation.
- project
- Project to which it belongs.
- SDG
- Associated SDG where applicable.
04 · Indicators
Examples that may be adapted to each project
The list defines possible measurement types; it contains no current values, targets or results.
Capabilities and results
- Training hours
- People trained
- Organizations strengthened
- Pre/post change in knowledge or capabilities
- People with improved access to WASH
- Facilities improved
Management and sustainability
- Active partnerships
- Resources mobilized
- Budget execution
- Cost per beneficiary/intervention
- Continuity of results
05 · Evidence
Source, frequency and data traceability
Future results should be associated with identifiable evidence, a collection method, periodicity and a responsible role, while respecting applicable privacy and publication safeguards.
Source
The record, instrument, document or system supporting the data point.
Frequency
A periodicity appropriate to the indicator and management or reporting requirements.
Responsibility
The role responsible for recording, reviewing and validating information before public use.
06 · SDGs
Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals
Initial institutional proposal. Alignment is presented as a framework and should be determined individually for each intervention.
Proposed cross-cutting contribution
Proposed contribution
Proposed contribution
Proposed contribution
Proposed contribution
Proposed contribution
Proposed contribution
Project-specific alignment
Applicable depending on intervention
Applicable depending on intervention
Applicable depending on intervention
Applicable depending on intervention
Alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals will be determined for each intervention according to its objectives, activities and indicators. This reference does not imply affiliation with, approval by or endorsement from the United Nations.
United Nations Sustainable Development Goals07 · Evaluation criteria
Evaluation criteria
The criteria are presented as a methodological reference for evaluation and learning; they do not constitute OECD certification.
Relevance
Relationship between needs, context and design.
Coherence
Compatibility and complementarity with other relevant interventions and policies.
Effectiveness
Progress towards intended objectives.
Efficiency
Relationship between resources, time, processes and results.
Impact
Contribution to wider positive or negative, intended or unintended effects.
Sustainability
Likelihood that benefits or changes continue beyond the intervention.
08 · Sustainability
Diversify to reduce dependency
Sustainability combines continuity of results, local capabilities, learning, partnerships and financial diversification.
Target financial diversification model
Target model. It does not represent the current historical composition of income.
09 · Escuela Laboratorio Verde Belén
Escuela Laboratorio Verde Belén
Escuela Laboratorio Verde Belén has a dedicated page explaining its institutional fit and target financial diversification model without converting visual material into programmatic evidence.
Explore the School10 · Reporting
From indicators to accountability
Future reporting should connect indicators, evidence, budget execution and the specific conditions of each funding instrument. Any public report should be based on verifiable records rather than estimates presented as results.
- Indicator
- Evidence
- Analysis
- Learning
- Reporting
- Decision